Maoist brutality

Those two terrorist is infact very gross that is no different than committed by Royal Nepalese Army personnels.

not different from ones committed by Royal Nepalese army

it seems that this neta is also maosist ko chamchha. .that's why he is happy to blame RNA, rather than acceptiing the brutlity of maosits..

it is better to hang these neta aka maoist , or shoot at sight. no 2nd talk.

long live freedom .....

I don't see any differences. The Islamic militants are vowing to destroy American empire by killing innocent Americans where as Nepali militants, Maoist, are vowing to implement Maoism in Nepal by terrifying Nepalese and killing those who oppose them. Though there are fundamental differences between Maoist's and Iraqi's ideology, but the way they are terrorizing innocent people in their respective countries are similar. So, I would say there is nothing difference between Nepalese Maoist and Iraqi militants.

abhui!!!!!!!!!!
where did u get that pic??
oh god! army did that??

SICKENING IMAGES
BAND THIS KIND OF POSTINGS IN SAJHA

President Wrote:
The Islamic militants are vowing to destroy American empire by killing innocent Americans

I agree that the militants are taking a brutal way to kill not only the Americans but so many other nationals but if you see the other side of the picture, why do you forget the Americans Killing Innocent Iraqis. Just becos you cannot read about it or see them in the media doesn't mean Americans are killing just the "militants". I can post hundreds of pictures where the Americans have killed women and children in Iraq and took pictures in front of their dead bodies. All this is happening today just because of BUSH and his stupid ideas or erasing Saddam. So, on one hand, if I hate the brutality of the militants , I dont as well support the Americans becaus they are even worse.....they don't deserve sympathy at all.
Talking aboiut the Maoist, I donno what the heck they are doing? This thing has been discussed in Sajha so many times......They should go after killing or kidnapping the Corrupted Leaders rather than killing those innocent lives....BUT DOES''NT LOOK LIKE THEY LISTEN TO ANYONE...........who is me anyway that they are gonna listen.

No offence President Bro..... I respect everyone's opinion .

niksnpl

Dude.....You gotta read between the lines more clearly. Let me remind you that I said that acts committed by those two terrorist groups (Maoist and Iraqi Islamists) are very gross the brutal and the brutality committed by Maoists and Iraqi Islamist are that is no different than the ones committed by Royal Nepal Army personnels.

I have put Maoists, Iraqi Islamists and Royal Nepal Army personnels in the equal footing based on the brutal acts committed. There is no justification for any such acts no matter if it is committed by Iraqi Islamists or Maoists or the Royal Nepalese Army.

Dude..why hold Iraqi Islamists and Maoists hold accountable for the brutal acts committed by them and forget totally about the brutal acts committed by Royal Nepalese Army personnels ?

All warring armed groups are responsible in cluding Royal Nepal Army personnels(who committed brutailty. Dude you presented only one side of the story.

i think mr neeta ji is siding with the maoists terrorists. RNA is doing what it can to keep the country safe. they have make some mistakes but that does not make them terrorists like the maoists. mr neetaji, it is very easy to lay the blame in the army sitting at comfortable homes in america, but if u have lost someone because of the maoists then u will understand how the people u are siding with are destroying the country.

In a war turned country there is high possibility of violating human rights from all the sides. In recent news on BBC; the numbers of Iraqis killed the conflict are from US coalition forces than car bombs exploded from Iraqi militant. But it doesn?t mean that American are terrorizing Iraqis. Terrorism can be defined; "the calculated use of violence (or threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimindation or coercion or instilling fear." From the definition it is not biased to tell that Maoist is using ?fear? as a weapon to terrorize Nepalese citizens.

Road blocks, week long strikes, bombs in the major markets etc are the examples that signify the terrorist act. Don't tag army as a terrorist. They use weapons to get rid of terrorism. If one doesn't like army killing terrorist then either he/she is also a terrorist or he/she doesn't know the present situation of Nepal. (Come to Nepal and figure out if army are terrorizing us!)

Neeta ji you said "Dude you presented only one side of the story." If you think Nepalese media are presenting only one side of the story then go to www.cpnm.org. You can easily figure out who is good in propaganda and the baseless human rights claims.

corrections
In a war turned country there is high possibility of violating human rights from all sides. In recent news from BBC; the numbers of Iraqis killed in the conflict from US coalition forces are more than car bombs exploded from Iraqi militant.
sorry for the mistake.....

bhumi_gh
Look..I do not believe in the doctrine inspired by George Bush in which he uses the phrase "Either with us or against us". If the world were like BLACK AND WHITE the life would have been so simple and great place.

Well, anyway, from whom is Royal Nepal Army trying to keep the country safe ?
Is it the Maoist or RNA itself. From the thousands of evidence itself it is "ultra clear" that the Maoist are using terror, and RNA has used the very same tactics of terror to counter the terror of the Maoists.

You mean getting rid of terror by the use of another terror ?

You mean to say if the Maoist use the terror it automatically get the label of terror but when the RNA uses the very same act of terror it does not qualify as an act of terror ?

If such mentatlity were not present in the Nepal Police force, they would have defeated the Maoists in 1998.

Operation Romeo (1994-1995) and Operation Kilo Shera 2 (1997-1997) were the first two major operations launched against the Maoists to completely get rid of Maoists.
See what happened after those two operations, instead being completely destroyed, the Maoist movement gained drastically and expanded to the persent scale NOT because the most people in those region joined Maoist but because there was no one to check and balance the brutal acts committed by the Police during those two major operations.

I guess no one helped the Maoist expand and gain the momentum more than the security forces of govt of Nepal. I guess even Baburam and Prachanded must had had been surprised by the unexpected help from the unexpected source.

PresidentofNepal

Well, since the beging of Iraq war, the Iraqi civilian casulties are not accounted for by the Americans which gives a message that Iraqi lives are not as important as the American lives therefore even (Iraqi) casulty figures are not worth keeping therefore there is no data Iraqi civilian casulty figures.

At least Nazis kept a complete record of millions of prisoners before and after they were murdered in their concentration camps across the eastern Europe in the World War 2.

This is the reality of maoist brutality in nepal.......

but this chart shows different scenario........

Red:- killed by maosit
Green:- killed by army

usofa

At least the Maoist murder or brutally injure civillians and leave the gruesome bodies in the open and public place therefore the public and the news media can report it (picture in the begining of the thread is an example). At at least the Maoists frankly admit it and take the responsibility of such actions no matter how poorly they justify their actions behind their acts, Which make newsmedia to figure out the number of murdered and injured civillians by the Maoists with far greater accuracy.

Does Nepal Police Force and RNA murders civillians and leave their bodies in the open and public place so that the public and the news media can see it? Do we know or will we ever be able to know how many civillians might have been killed by the RNA and Nepal Police in the past ?

If they were to leave the bodies in the public place for the public and the news media to see it would have been 1000 times easier to know accuracy of death counts caused by the RNA and the Police. Even an admission of murder would make it so easy to know at least the number of deaths.

And how about the ones who were arrested, killed and burried without the knowledge of public or the press ?

The difference over here is that the Maoists do it openly so we know the number of caculty and the scale of brutality on dead and injured civilians but unfortunately Royal nepal Army and the Police do the very same acts of brutality in secrecy so we neither know the number of civilian casaulty nor the scale of brutality.

After the so called democracy, its not an irony that Nepal's situation has been true to murphy's law. We all have contributed towards it one way or another. And thus came (more or less) the movement, a political intially; but 'genocidal' as the time sailed by. The movement is popularly known as "Prachanda path" aka a blood path if you ask me. A blood of innocent, poor, hardworking; people who basically have hard time to meet their hands to mouth (typical nepali, if i may).

Those so called revolutionary radical group went for the blood bath of exactly the same people who were the likes of themselves to begin with. In the meanwhile those who were close to the mighty and sacrosanct, who in large part were the very oppressive people that radical group were/are rebelling against remain untouched.

Off comes the RNA, to protect the country and moreover their master who is sacrosanct to them, for their own (ulterior) motives, and the "clean-up" act. In the due course along with its lesser powerful colleagues Nepal Police & Nepal Sasastra Police ( hence, NP & NSP respectively) in the name of duty, protection and serving the Nation ( read primarily KING & Infamous politicians) they more of less adhere to the same route of killing innocent "typical Nepalese". Initially, NP and NSP buoyant by the presence of RNA showed gallant face, and presumed a pre-empted victory. But after more or less realizing and facing the fear of their lives they started to use all means ( read violence, disappearance, torture, killing) along with their big brother RNA, which lead the way.

Now the question arises, are RNA ( with NP & NSP) any better than Maoist? I say, a subtle at times, yet, a resounding YES. They can not be put in the same scale. Sometimes, as unfortunate as it is, we HAVE to unknowingly or otherwise adhere to the paths our enemies'. For/ If they themselves have to fear for their life, why can they not react ( when necessary and short of choice) to their enemies actions.

Let me explain, Tango a beautiful dance, if i'm not wrong, is lead by man, just like many others.The female follows the man. If the man leads the female to wrong moves and hence, female follows, in absense of any choice ( at that moment), I agree the fault lies on both of them, but more so, with the man. Ditto here. Maoist lead the way for brutal killing, mass murder, committing heinous crimes, went on a rampage like an elephant, crushing each and everyone on its way, EXCEPT the one who they were supposed to.

To some extent RNA, NP, NSP followed suit. Both inexplicable, and inhuman, but when weighted on the "Dosh Naapne Taraju" maoist leads they way by heaps. The genesis for RNA to follow suit in this disgusting act is maoist itself. Thus in my book, in the law of averages, maoists ares more blameworthy than RNA.

The picture speaks for itself.

Disgusted with maoist & disapointed with RNA
IndisGuise::((