Posted by: thatAngryGuy April 21, 2017
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
About 6 months rule from trackitt.com ,
So I checked with an acquaintance who is an immigration lawyer. (I try not to bother him with such things, since he is not doing this work for me personally.)
Editing a bit, but this is his comment on that:
"The underlying issue is one of putative fraud. If Company ABC sponsors you for a GC and literally the day after you receive it you start working for Company XYZ, it "suggests" that your intent to work for them "permanently" (i.e., indefinitely) was bogus. It opens up the possibility that someone could denounce the transaction -- for example, someone in Company ABC who wished to retaliate by complaining to the government.
The standard advice to clients in cases of this type is: to be legit, the job offer must be "permanent", which in practice means 'of indefinite duration'. Whether changing jobs on "Day Two" would likely occasion an inquiry is doubtful."
He goes on to say that he's never seen a case of this type prosecuted in more than 30 years.
Editing a bit, but this is his comment on that:
"The underlying issue is one of putative fraud. If Company ABC sponsors you for a GC and literally the day after you receive it you start working for Company XYZ, it "suggests" that your intent to work for them "permanently" (i.e., indefinitely) was bogus. It opens up the possibility that someone could denounce the transaction -- for example, someone in Company ABC who wished to retaliate by complaining to the government.
The standard advice to clients in cases of this type is: to be legit, the job offer must be "permanent", which in practice means 'of indefinite duration'. Whether changing jobs on "Day Two" would likely occasion an inquiry is doubtful."
He goes on to say that he's never seen a case of this type prosecuted in more than 30 years.