I already answered ne0's question :P and I'll try to answer again:

I don't see how it is so wrong to get paid for speeches. Politicians get paid for speeches all the time. Everyone takes money. And in today's political world, taking donations is indispensable. This is how the system is. If you want to say the system is flawed, I will agree with you but I'm not going to criticize Hillary for it. I will criticize the system. Taking those donations from the big banks doesn't necessarily signify that the acceptor is completely in their pocket. Bernie, too, has huge donations from companies like Alphabet, Apple, Amazon, Intel. Are these companies trying to court Bernie? You don't consider Bernie corrupt for taking donations from monopolies like Apple and Amazon, but when Hillary does it, you come up with these malicious attacks.

All I see is the republicans and sadly, Bernie supporters politicizing everything (and I mean everything) about Hillary: "emails", "Benghazi", "she looks obnoxious", "she has crazy eyes", "she has a maniacal laugh", "she is a liar", "she didn't divorce Bill", "she is not personable" and blah blah blah. Are you sure you are not pandering to the misogynist inside you? ;)