Mily thanks for sharing Hillary's response! One can always squirm ones way through any kind of allegations. Even convicted felons can say they have changed their views but that will not undo the harm they have caused. As I have mentioned before, there have been over 500,000 deaths caused by Iraq invasion that Hillary supported. Yes she has changed her mind about it now but certain things are irreversible and voters should not have to hope that now she has a better sense of judgment than before, when even republicans are beginning to say that the Iraq war was a mistake.

It's one thing for radical thoughts to evolve over time but if common sense and sound judgment evolves over time then that's not exactly the type of quality that one would hope on a President of US who has the power to change the lives of so many in the US and in the world. It begets the questions - how many more matters of common sense and sound judgment will a presidential candidate have to evolve through in order to become the ideal commander in chief?

The lack of stance shows that the person is indecisive, lacks convictions, and is unpredictable. In other words, you may be voting because you agree with his/her stance on a particular issue (or set of issues), but then the person could change position at any moment, so you don't really know what you're going to get. If this "flip flopping" happens in more than one instance then it will be more difficult to trust that someone will keep their promise.