Posted by: ny2 March 5, 2015
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
@bichitra....u r just spitting out ur assumptions as facts, aren't u??? Facts are proven statements. Let me spit out my opinion (not facts) too.
Just because u think it's a paid service does not make it a fact since nobody has said a word about paid service, unless u have some inside info.
TIA service is disrupted not because of Turkish airlines but because of inclement weather and TIA's lack of instrument guided landing system.
Turkish airlines is not liable for any financial losses for the airport or other airlines because of the accident. It's the airport's responsibility to remove any debris out of runway, not the airlines responsibility.
It's Nepal government/TIA officials who requested Indian govt to provide the support (check nepalese newspapers or interviews of TIA officials). Turkish airlines also asked for it along with Nepal govt. The more days that plane stays there, the more losses and more embarassment Nepal gets. Nepal is more interested than Turkish airlines to move that plane out of the runway.
Just because u think it's a paid service does not make it a fact since nobody has said a word about paid service, unless u have some inside info.
TIA service is disrupted not because of Turkish airlines but because of inclement weather and TIA's lack of instrument guided landing system.
Turkish airlines is not liable for any financial losses for the airport or other airlines because of the accident. It's the airport's responsibility to remove any debris out of runway, not the airlines responsibility.
It's Nepal government/TIA officials who requested Indian govt to provide the support (check nepalese newspapers or interviews of TIA officials). Turkish airlines also asked for it along with Nepal govt. The more days that plane stays there, the more losses and more embarassment Nepal gets. Nepal is more interested than Turkish airlines to move that plane out of the runway.