BC seems to have taken this personally now. I'm done with the discussion. I remain adamant with what I said. It was an idiotic act. Just because average Joes talked about it doesn't mean a whole lot. I bet a huge majority of people in the US are talking about the ex-cop who went on a rampage killing several officers. Does it mean anything? This scenario is no different. Most neutrals aren't gonna do anything about them. If anything, more Tibetans are likely to follow his suits and get involved in killing themself. Hence, the act won't be pointless, but definitely idiotic.