Gazadi:

no_quiero,samsara
        Its true that lot of people were killed during the insurgency but all were not killed by Maoist alone.More than half is killed by  govt.The change u r seeing today in Nepal was possible after that.If u look the history of any country in the world,these kinds of things happen.I am not endorsing the fact that the killing of innocent people is good  but  that  was an event during the process.You can flash back to the revolution of 1990.Many people were killed during the protest and sth was changed in the country as per the leaders.
  I don't know what u guys think and how u take the achievement of 1990.Many innocent people were killed at that time and many sacrified their life leaving their wife widow,children with a dark future and look what those leaders did with the authority.They built the future of their near and dear ones and grabbed all the money.Take for an instance the condition of NOC and other public offices.I am fed up with these so called democratic parties.You might be related to some of those ass holes and don't try to accept the truth.I have seen the disparity they have created.You know what I would rather accept King Gyanendra as a supremo of Nepal than these corrupted,wicked leaders.
  Samsara, "If there had been no Maoists, Nepal would've been a much different nation", how come dude?One thing about u, how long have u been in US dude?I am discussing my thoughts in Sajha,so better dare to mind ur language...moron, fuggers, these are not the words for me.Jot down what u think, u also show the same character as those fool leaders , man.Try to convince others with ur reason.

Gazadi:

U pointed out a good reason dude.We all know they did all those things which should have never happened and now they are claiming their victories.It was an insurgency and the two parties did so wicked things that even they never care about the basic human rights.How did maoist came to this point and why they lift the weapons?It's an easy answer.They broke from a small party,janamorcha in 2051 and the election was about to come.There was no way to even win a  single electorate  zone because they were even a fraction of  a small party which got just 11 seats on the election of 2048.So,they endorsed the way to boycott the election and lift arms.No body ever dare to care that small fraction until they made significant attacks.If u remember those days how the leaders of N.C used to make comments.Deuba once told he can grab Maoist from the nook and cranny of every caves and forest of Dolpa,Rukum,Rolpa. These leaders just added oil on the flame.They never even thought about the consequences and what might its impact be.So, maoist used the poor,dalit people as a tool.
  Its over now and I know the result never justifies the means but we don't have any other options right now.I have seen lot of guys discussing about Prachanda,Baburam....but no one has really said a word about who might be the effective leader of Nepal next.Why r Baburam and Prachandra discussed so much?It makes us think again.Girija is not a good leader but he is the only legend in nepali politics who can get support from international arena.
  So,guys while discussing scribble sth ,  if u don't  wanna c  Prachanda or Baburam as a  supremo, who might  u think can run effectively? Lets make a wise discussion and learn sth from others.I regularly write on sajha and u know wat,I don't people making comments.They never appreciate other reasons.Every body has their own perspective and judgements, so we  r different from each other.If we all have the same preferences and choice,think wat would happen?

Samsara:

 Gazadi, too much weed in your brain got you hallucinating son!!  You bring the revolution of 1990 and compare it with the Maoists??  WTF?  Its like you're bringing about a discussion of the Saints when I talk about Adolf Hitler and his other anti-christ likes.  Listen foolio, in 1990, a mere 14 people died in the revolution...In the Maoists revolution 13,000+ were killed and 10,000+ are unaccounted for.  How on earth can both phenomenons be compared??  And were there lootings, kidnappings, bank robbings, destruction of public infrastructure, extortions, etc. back in 1990?  Damn, where does your reasoning even stem outta?  Go back to smoking more of that stuff rather than come up here wanting to be some damn wisecrack!

Also, you ask me why I say, "If there had been no Maoists, Nepal would've been a much different nation"?  Did you even read my post before blabbering such an ignorant statement?  Damn, the answer was right in the post!  Use that brains for comprehending sometimes, would ya? could ya? or should ya?  I've put the reasons down again (cut and paste).  Just read it this time!!  BTW, Just the fact that you support Prachanday and his commies, it shows how much of a real-world comprehending ability you possess!  Saddam, Stalin, Hitler, Napoleon and the Ayotollahs were all great charasmatic leaders...But also the most evil!  As far as I see Prachanday is just another wannabe Stalin and its about time his wings got clipped!!