Posted by: ImI September 27, 2006
Myths about Monarchy in Nepal
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
loote.. This is beauty of democracy that sometimes it doesn't go in favor of what you want.If the things you think is only correct and in your analysis and reasoning correct works ..would that be democracy.Undoubtly there has not been any philosophy more successful than democracy so your skeptical nature regards to think that you have yet learn to respect other who differ your opinion.I for example if a fair election elects PRACHANDA next President of Nepal.I am ready to accept it.Mind it what i say..fair elections(yes fair in terms of neutral people).Where as you disagreee and disrespect the decision of millions of people who favor KING. I know you are not maoist and you know i am not royalist.we differ in view and we express ourselfs because it is the freedom of speach and thinking.That is democracy. In communisism ..it is much more similar to king.There is always one person who is ruling and in command like :CASTRO,MAO,LENIN...they are similar kind of idol worshippers. why i think Nepal needs king :i am not royalist some dumb fuc%s immediately runs after my ass when i say this...hehhee 1]King is not as evil as he has been potrayed 2]Inability of Nepalese politicians 3]Culture and History are linked with it now i don't need to explain this . i think you guys can think for yourself.Even then Nepalese people decide to kick out king knowing the incapability of their ,it is still acceptable to me.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article