Ashu, You sure should continue to write, stimulate and all that. However, the case at hand is the accusation that one of your conclusions/propositions that the political parties should take part in the election to defeat the King is ridiculous and that you ABUSED Schelling's name and Game Theory to give credit to that proposition. You sure are not done yet. It's your turn to present your 'proof' to your 'conclusion'. It does not have to be in 'sexy mathematical model'. Simple argument in layman's language will suffice. So, are you upto it, or would rather prefer to live in the illusion that you won the argument by stating that you believe that the accuser is a "Marxist", "Intellectually dishonest" and "so-called scientist" ?