When democracy was finally granted, Gyanendra had his resentment. Aishworya was unpleased too. But Birendra did not want bloodshed in the country. Nepal was hardhit by India's sanction so he gave up which prompted feud amongst the courtiers and within the palace. However the palace did as much bickering as it could to put it's authority in the constitution of Nepal 2047. A couple of drafts were ammended several times before the final publication was mae and the Monarchy pressurized as much as it could to put clauses that gave the largest authority to the King although the theme of the constitution was a constituional monarchy. The constitution of 2047 was in itself flawed and it was foreseen from there that the palace would act to its vested interest on the back of those flaws. They were just waiting for their favourable time so that they can twist and misuse and misguide the provisions of the constituion of 2047. Then came Girija and 12 years of failed democracy with him. The palace watching like a spectator taking note of the incompetence of political leaders. It wanted more mess from them so that palace could intervene at will one day. The parties and politicians just did what the palace and the insiders wanted to see. Moreoever maoists came into the fore. There is no evidence to support the allegations that the Palace and specifically Gyanendra or Dhirendra or both of them initiated to start the Maoists problem. Specially what from what we see today, we cannot be sure that Gyanendra was responsible in one or the other way to instigate maoist insurgency in Nepal. But we cannot totally ignore this suspicion. Things will be clear from the developments in a few months time. In the mean time, Gyanendra was worried with the behaviour of his son Prince Paras. He was about to eclipsing the notoriety of Dipendra in his early youths by beating and bullying people at discotheques, driving madly at people and so on. Birendra was pressurized to put off paras's royal status after the public outrage on the incident that took singer Pravin Gurung's life(Resham Firiri). so on Paras matter also, there was a big feud going on in the palace. Then all of a sudden, the Royal Massacre ocured. God knows the truth. But King Gyanendra avoided the death party. His entire blood survived. His wife, son, daughter, close aid- Dr. Shahi and all survived. but Birendra's no trace of Birendra's blood survived. 'Deependra killed everybody and himself'. Whatever be the truth but this massacre is also not a totally revealed truth. You cannot be sure that what was told about how it happened is the real truth. Neither you can rule out that possibility because nothing is impossible. But we can think that a man who was a King in the age of 4 must have some ambitions to sit on the same throne once again in life. Still a thought. We are more wrong to this judgement then right because what we see is a truth. what we don't see may be a truth but we cannot be certain without a proof. There's not a trace of proof to support this arguement. If there was conspiracy from the present king against his brother, then that was the most shrewdly and effectively staged conspiracy in the world. More cleverly staged then the sept. 11 attacks on the USA. Far more clever conspiracy then the current one in which he has been able to cut off a landlocked country from the rest of the world as if Nepal is the worst hit country hit by the tsunami and isolated from communication. Now I will be writing my assement on the last 2 and a half years of Gyanendra's reign and explore what prompted him to plot a coup. Yes, This is a coup no matter his real intentions are for the betterment of the country. To be continued...... Write your feedbacks to me. I will give a balanced thought till the end. Pls go on reading