GeetMai, just wanna argue, do we?
What I posted was seriously not enough for you? At this point, I generally move on thinking the other side just wants to argue. But I want to give you a benefit of doubt and will expand further as you've requested.


First of all, the news itself. Like I said, Kantipur posted it wrong. Would you believe one source or multiple other sources?

http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/indian-army-chief-arrives-in-kathmandu-to-be-conferred-with-honorary-rank-of-nepal-general/story-sxiKeiWgZDovH7YAjN1T4M.html

http://spotlightnepal.com/News/Article/Indian-Army-Chief-General-Bipin-Rawat-Visited-Nepa

Even Kantipurpost says the same thing: http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2017-03-28/indian-army-chief-rawat-in-nepal.html


Like the articles say, and I have been saying all along,
"Nepal and India have a long tradition of conferring such titles on the chiefs of their armies since 1950 to signify the close military-to-military ties."


If both countries have been doing it for over 60 years, why is it necessary for a "developed" country to do the same thing for you to feel that we aren't doing the "chaplusi".

I posted another link from Kathmandupost which stated that India did the SAME EXACT THING to Nepali COAS. Are they doing the chakadi too?

If this doesn't address your concern, I will just assume you don't want to understand.