GP ji, I think I owe you a reply. First of all, as someone who has known you on Sajha for some three years now, it feels nice to see you for the first time worrying about 'Public opinion' about yourself. Because the hallmark of your postings on Sajha has been absolutely no fear, shame or reluctance to put your conservative social views and right wing fanatic political views, not to mention your deranged arguments. It has been consistently so since the first day I encountered you till today except for that interesting period of time when we Sajhaites had put you on the throne of HahooGuruhood. During that interesting period you were really gentler, calmer and funny too as if HahooGuru was a relaxing okhati for you. But now you are back to yourself. As for your fatwa against DN Dhungana, what are you saying GP ji ? Are you saying you did not issue it ? Or you could not have said such things ? Come on GP ji, why Dhungana only, have you left anybody at all, well except the monarch ? There is hardly any person and group, except for the monarch, whom you have not called for extermination at one or the other time. You have made yourself a legend in Sajha doing all that all the time. Almost every posting of yours is violently against non-royalist groups and people with or without specific fatwa. I am surprised that you are asking for specific references. Are you denying the things you were so proudly doing ? If you deny, I will not mind to dig out the Sajha archive to cite you. I see you often swirling your sword in empty air aiming at some 'Maodai' whom you say you met in your previous life. I would like to comment on that although your deranged and crazy idea about the Maobadis as a whole makes that of not much sense. First of all, as I suggested in my earlier posting, your idea about the Maoists is crazy. You see Maoists everywhere and in everybody- Human Right activists, Journalists and every non-royalist members of the civil society (let's forget your crazy conclusion that Maobadi ko prabhav ghatdaichha. I'll comment on that a little later !). Now about this reportedly self-proclaimed 'Maodai'. I don't know about this guy because I don't read SCN (I haven't read any interesting reference from anybody else either, so I am not interested to waste my time digging and reading this 'Maodai' on SCN). However, I can say one thing without any reluctance. I assume GPji is a royalist (ASSUME because he has not directly said it). For that matter, I respect any Maoist more than I respect GP ji. So this 'Maodai' is more respectable to me than GP ji. Even if this is not the case, there is an interesting anecdote where GP ji le malaai Maodai sanga saaino laggaidinubhayeko chha- brother of Maodai bhanera. That anecdote is interesting and revealing. Interesting because it was my first encounter with GP ji and revealing because it really reveals GPji?s craziness. No, I am not calling GP ji a crazy because he called me a Maoist, but because of the CRAZY REASONS he called me a Maoist. Let's see those reasons for which GP ji found me a Maoist. I had hardly posted first 2/3 postings on Sajha, GP ji jumped on me and called me "a brother of 'Maodai' ". Among my postings, one was a small remark on the Monarch of Nepal, for which- it might be more telling to cite Biswo's reply than to give the posting itself- Biswo, then still a monarchist, had replied in the words something like this: 'Nepe, that is the sanest argument against monarchy I ever heard'. Then the thread where GP ji prophetically called me a Maoist was Ashu's humor thread called 'I want my NTV'. I had criticized Ashu's humor for what I termed 'selective comprehension'. Basically Ashu's satire included all political groups EXCEPT the monarch. (It is interesting to note that I had to repeat the same criticism two years later when Ashu presented his stand up). Anyway, so, basically, anybody who questions the monarchy was a Maoist to GP ji. If GP ji was an anapadh gawar, I would understand. But he is a Ph.D. degree holder. Only a crazy Ph.D. holder should believe that anybody who questions the monarchy is a Maoist. No ? And there is no end to GP ji's crazy suspicion. However, this time I would be a little bit cautious. Because I am not sure if GP ji is really suspecting me. But sometimes it sounds like that GP ji is suspecting me of not being a brother to but the 'Maodai' himself . Are you GP ji ? Because some of your descriptions and emphasis matche me. Living in Israel ! Disappearing in the US ! I indeed lived in Israel for several years and then moved to the US in 2001. As for living a 'burzuwa' life in Israel, I suppose I did and I have always. If an active apolitical social life is a 'burzuwa' thing, then it was indeed. I was once the elected president of the Student Union of my small campus. I have been called a Godfather by the secretary of the campus for what I used to do for our small Nepali community and so on. Regarding my Maoist like political activity, I have contributed at least one political piece to TND. Now, GP ji, whether your interesting mind suspects me of being 'Maodai' himself or not, I don't see any point aiming your sword at him here in Sajha. It is because, dear GP ji, you don't have any moral superiority over any 'Maodai'. First of all you are a royalist and your opposition to the Maoists is related to your support to another evil. Second of all, you are violent person yourself. Third your arguments are merely better than a paagal pralaap. No offence intended. I meant to say really paagal. And by that I meant a person who can not accept objective realities or who makes crashing escapes from them. Let me show you how. Let?s check your statement in this thread vis a vis that from Paramendra's thread on the situation of the Maoists. Here you said 'Maobadi ko prabhav ghatdai chha'. Then you go to the data that shows the opposite and you have no problem acting as if the data does not slaps on your cheek. On top of that, you jump to the craziest idea that now the King and the Maoist together should rule the country. I am really worried about your thought process.