Hi AryaSakti, Intersting! Of course your posting revails that you are quite biased, but who knows you may be right. I have some questions for you. 1. You said "manusmiriti was origionally faultless but latter writers inserted senseless laws", what is faultless manusmirti? 2. You said, << Likewise, the Veda was given by God, Parameshvar, to Mitra in the Aryan homeland as a law ensuring perfection of divine truth. However, in 2000BC Ved Vyasa translated the Veda into Samskrit and polluted its absolute truth with man-made errors. Thus, modern interpretations are part fact and partially fiction. Later books the Ramayana and Mahabharata are not divinely ordained but are itihash written by religious men. As such they are not perfect but interesting. >> -If Veda was translated by Vyansa in Sanskrit in 4000 years ago, who wrote the Mahabharat? - If Veda is in polluted form what is its pure form? - If Mahabharat is a real history, Itihas can you say the range of time when it was taken place? - The language of Ramayan and Mahabharat clearly shows that they were written after Panini, do you want to say that Krishna is younger than Buddha? Because Panini is 2/3 century after the Buddha. -If you say the war took place much before than it was written, remember the writer was Byans himself who had witnessed the war. -Ok, if you want to say the war took place much earlier but transmitted through Sruti and was written somewhere around 2nd century BC, when the war dated? -If you say it was dated before Veda, ie 40000 years ago, why Vedas didn't mention it? -If you say the war took place in between Vedic Period and Buddha, why Buddhist scriputres don't mention anything about Krishna and incarnation sytem, where as Buddhist literatures tell a lot about Veda and Vedic way of life? -Fine, for some reason if that part was taken away from Buddhist literature, what do you want to say, a Yug last just few centuries? Rememember, Ram was in Dwapara Yug, Krishna is in Treta and Buddha is in Kali. I am just talking about Krishna and Buddha, if I include Rama too, that will be great mess up. -Mesopotamia civilization and egyptian civilization were considered world's first civiliations which is considered 2000 to 3000 BC. Harappan civilization of Indus vally was after these two civilization. Our ancistors from central Europe, invaded Harappan which is considered. around 1500 BC. If you believe in modern science and anthropology, when do you want to say Vedas were revailed by god to Our fore fathers, Aryans? And when did Ram ruled in North India, Ayaudhhya? Don't forget, Aryan migrated from Indus valley to North India, which must be much after 1500 BC. -Ram was considered to be in Dwapara Yuga, having very long life and he died, when another Yuga about to pass, he took another Avatar, Krishan. How long these Yuga's are? If you ask to Jyotish, they will tell you millions of millions of years. Please enlighten me. -Then after that Treta Yug, in Kali, Ram took Buddha Avtar, please tell me what was the time gap between Ram and Buddha, form Dwapara to Kali?