I read articles you pasted. I also saw the photo (back side) of Mr Rauniyar. I saw evidence of one lathi hit on his back. Mr. Rauniyar failed to post other photos if he was really beaten as told in the article ? Why he is not putting all photos? Who is stopping him ? Could you plsase check his lower back. I see only one lathi hit.

In court, in public, when you say something you have to produce evidence isn't it ?

The photo was taken by someone else, then why they didn't choose to show brutalness?

When journalist says one thing and failed to produce evidence then his writing becomes skeptical isn't it.

Yes, as I said earlier police are becoming bit aggressive ( they even use lathi against journalist)

When you want to blame professionaly then you have to examine both side professionally

You beleive what andolan Kari saying, someoe will believe what police is saying, and fighting starts once again.

I would have believed what Mr. Rauniyar said in his article if he had published evidence of three four lathis or hit on face or front side of the body or hand or leg or even torn colthings. But no such evidence were produced.

I don't make my opinion on he say's/she says type of thing, I am not sentimentally linked with either parties. I read what both parties are saying but I need evidence to be convinced.

As I said earlier if leaders incite violence in US, Europe, they will be charged criminally. In Nepal no such things happens and innocent bystanders get killed.
In democratic countries you are not allowed to take swords, lathis, . police will shoot in us or in Europe if ppl start to arson.

You are allowed peacefully demonstration, but no lathis, no swords.

I will blame

1.madhesi leadrs for inciting violence, failing to keep demonstration peaceful, allowing ppl to carry swords and lathis,

2. Police for failing to track real arsonist and instead firing at inoocent ppl

Tell me the name of a democrat country where inciting violence is allowed by law, and arson is allowed

Tell be the name of a democratic country whre everyone agrees on everything.
In a democratic country, disagreement is very common you disagree but you are not allowed to incite violence and you are not permitted for violent rallies.

In dang district police were killed, also in nepalgaj

Party office were touched so what you expect from police? Rose??

If u you disagree with something will you resort to violence to force your idea? That is anarchism. And anarchism has no place in democracy.
Madhesi disagree? fine, they want to demonstrate? Fine. They want to change constitution ? Fine, no problem. But nextime convincr madhsi ppl win election and change constitution, who is stopping it?

Madhesi leaders were not able to convince madhesi, they lost election.

In democracy if you lose one election means you have to wait another election.

In my professional analysis those madhesi parties who lost most seats in election are actively participating in this andolan just for vote in next election, they have nothing to loose . they want to project them as great mashiha of madedh . and for what, ? To win next election, that's all. Poor innocent madhesi dying for nothing..

By the way there more madhesi in maobadi, emale and kangresg than madhesi parties. these madhesi won the election. Don't they represent madhei?
What type of democracy we are talking about?