Posted by: confused October 19, 2004
Whom to consider educated in this century!
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
contains alot of grammer error.. Gp, perception is our sensory experiences with the world, so math is no where a preception rather An Absolute Truth. As defined by most of the psychologists , preception is the mind's ordering of sensory stimuli based on the observer's previous experiences, and how do you mind 2 + 2 a preception. the product between those two varibles is same for me and you, but the same beauty we look at might not be full filling for him. When we talk about preception we cannot miss Kant, who has been a important figure on Preception, "our common understanding of the world is possible because our minds impose a specific structure on our sensations according to an innate, universal pattern." and when talking about Education, education will teach a man what to read, not what to NOT READ. To be a scholar, you need to discover the path of philosophy, till then you are just Educated fool, with you pens open and your egos bursting out. Semi-educated peoples can not stand arguing, so they finally use Muscle: History has proven this false all along, Alexander the great had been educated and was rained with great knowledge, still he slaughtered thousands of lives, why? Becaues, his Morals didnt held him back. Understanding of Moral Principle is far worthier than getting a better education. and talking about Entropy, it has been questioned by Quantum theory, which suggests many possibilities, and that is why science is absoulteness.. Gurl Interupted, i was being ironic...its not easy to think outside of the material world and define.. but you have also given an example of absoluteness...and you have BASHED WOMAN GENDER BY DOING AN HONEST MISTAKE...God, cannot be considered him or her, god is a creator, if we figure who God is, then we have solved all the possible problems that puzzle us.. so GOD is not a HIM... and about arguing, more arguing creates nothing but more arguments, we should not study philosophy by arguing rather by understanding and applying the theory, and then agreeing or disagreeing with it. Sake of arguing is waste of TiME.. passinthru, you are absolutely right" Pleasure disappoints, possibility never."
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article