Vhotee
While I agree with your argument on theory, the reality I have seen is much different.

I am not a religious person, but I go to temple and sometimes church for peace of mind. I don't dislike Christianity or any other religion. The issue I am having is the conversion that's being done - not because I am worried about Hinduism becoming extinct, but the way conversions have been taking place in Nepal. Most of the times, the poor and uneducated are promised of a miraculous cure or something else in return. I absolutely detaste the idea of trying to convert somebody else to your religion, voluntarily or forcefully. A person should take his/her own initiative and if he/she likes to convert, he/she should be able to. But many NGOs, diplomats and foreign forces are hell bent on converting Nepalis and there might be bigger motive behind the conversion.

As ridiculous and over the top Nas' claim sound, sometimes there are truth to them. My question is what determines the best path for an issue of contention? Is it the majority or something else? If majority, Hindus will easily out number any other group. The fact that most are quiet, shouldn't be taken as their weakness.