don't want be ass but "nepal" might be the right ans. Why? of course tps filing people would be in usa anyway by definition of tps redundant to fill if usa is the ans. Why still there? because tps is also eligible for people with last designated country residence but have no citizenship. like Tibetan refugee who used to resides in nepal. they would fill out like: country of citizen: china (or tibet whatever) country of resident: nepal, make sense? by having that  they would know if country of residence is nepal- a person is eligible otherwise they would have no idea if  such person is eligible  but again me no lawyer hai