Posted by: many April 2, 2015
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Sorry badhijanne
Felt lazy to type in Nepali. Anyway according to this it says different story http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_Nepal
Introduction of corn or maize in nepal was done in the 60s as a secondary staple food. Before it was only rice. So how can it happen? This type of distortion of history should be condem because they are teaching this as a part of kids curriculum. People like us grew up thinking the story was real. Then started to study more history books. The same story has been in books about Chanakya too while Chandragupt was attacking Pataliputra and failing. Isn't it time to set the record straight. If you read on book about Prithivi Narayan Shah they have completely distorted the history saying people of Kritipur's nose wasn't cut but in fact the Nepali term nakh kattinu was emphasized because they lost the war so Kirtipures couldn't show their face because of loosing the war.
Felt lazy to type in Nepali. Anyway according to this it says different story http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_Nepal
Introduction of corn or maize in nepal was done in the 60s as a secondary staple food. Before it was only rice. So how can it happen? This type of distortion of history should be condem because they are teaching this as a part of kids curriculum. People like us grew up thinking the story was real. Then started to study more history books. The same story has been in books about Chanakya too while Chandragupt was attacking Pataliputra and failing. Isn't it time to set the record straight. If you read on book about Prithivi Narayan Shah they have completely distorted the history saying people of Kritipur's nose wasn't cut but in fact the Nepali term nakh kattinu was emphasized because they lost the war so Kirtipures couldn't show their face because of loosing the war.