Whether she is right or wrong, I have to commend her for taking a stance. Politicians are too diplomatic and it is kind of nice to see somebody willing to go against the common sentiments.

Now, of course, I say this without knowing her history and am basing it solely on the act that's mentioned in the article.

Also, I am torn in my stance to support or oppose the dual-citizenship. I see point from both sides, and I will just go with what they decide to do - instead of making an agenda out of it.