Posted by: Kiddo February 28, 2015
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Nas bro
Hope you understand my frustration with these kinds of claims. I respect your giving benefit if doubt to the "inventors," but the face value of the claims almost insult the Scientific understanding. Let me elaborate.
First and foremost, there is no such thing as perpetual machine. Google Besslers fly wheel, that was the closest anybody got to making others believe and that was a hoax.
Law of Conservation of Energy state energy cannot be created not destroyed. Like I said earlier, gravitation might bring the mass down but what would take the same mass up? How do you create energy to lift the mass up to complete the cycle?
Let's look at the gravity light. As the mass (rocks or dead weight) pull the string down, it generates electricity, but a rock can't keep going down. It has to go up somehow to complete the cycle. In cast of gravity light, a human intervention is required. After 20-30 mins, somebody has to lift the stone up.
Like we said, hydro power primarily works because of the gravitational energy. As water flows down due to gravity (change in PE), it rotates turbine. Luckily we have continued source of water so that we don't need to bring the water up mechanically. What medium is the inventor using?
Unless u have continued source of a medium, gravity alone will NOT work.
The work by Romanian "inventor" was done around 2010; why then it hasn't been mass produced? Why are we wasting our time and money chasing after hydro, fossil or other sources of energy? Just because it was in Romanian national tv, doesn't give it any credence; unless we are shown how it works. I have seen some prototypes of his machine and they simply shouldn't work perpetually.
I am still discussing this because of two reasons. Well first it insults scientific rigors required to justify a mechanism. Second people like KC are wasting their time and money, and possibly others too, by chasing unscientific and ludicrous methods. I find it a little sad, frankly.
Hope you understand my frustration with these kinds of claims. I respect your giving benefit if doubt to the "inventors," but the face value of the claims almost insult the Scientific understanding. Let me elaborate.
First and foremost, there is no such thing as perpetual machine. Google Besslers fly wheel, that was the closest anybody got to making others believe and that was a hoax.
Law of Conservation of Energy state energy cannot be created not destroyed. Like I said earlier, gravitation might bring the mass down but what would take the same mass up? How do you create energy to lift the mass up to complete the cycle?
Let's look at the gravity light. As the mass (rocks or dead weight) pull the string down, it generates electricity, but a rock can't keep going down. It has to go up somehow to complete the cycle. In cast of gravity light, a human intervention is required. After 20-30 mins, somebody has to lift the stone up.
Like we said, hydro power primarily works because of the gravitational energy. As water flows down due to gravity (change in PE), it rotates turbine. Luckily we have continued source of water so that we don't need to bring the water up mechanically. What medium is the inventor using?
Unless u have continued source of a medium, gravity alone will NOT work.
The work by Romanian "inventor" was done around 2010; why then it hasn't been mass produced? Why are we wasting our time and money chasing after hydro, fossil or other sources of energy? Just because it was in Romanian national tv, doesn't give it any credence; unless we are shown how it works. I have seen some prototypes of his machine and they simply shouldn't work perpetually.
I am still discussing this because of two reasons. Well first it insults scientific rigors required to justify a mechanism. Second people like KC are wasting their time and money, and possibly others too, by chasing unscientific and ludicrous methods. I find it a little sad, frankly.