Posted by: kalidasbhaisaab December 5, 2014
Help Help Help
Login in to Rate this Post:     1       ?         Liked by
Sorry mikal - today being Friday and I being drunk I have not read through all the detail in this thread .I think I have an opinion about the 'Non Compete' part of the employment contract. If you don't mind please could you answer the following question (in the following made up scenario)
Client = Bank of Yamrica; Prime Vendor = Accenture; Ramro Vendor = Co. A; NJ ko Jhoor Desi Vendor tara mero employer = Co. B.
1. I am working for Co. B, where Ramro Vendor is Co.A and Prime Vendor is Accenture. Right now, Co. A is offering me Full Time Job so I will join Co. A for a Different Client (say, United Health Group).
2. I am working for Co. B, where Ramro Vendor is Co.A and Prime Vendor is Accenture. Right now, Co. A is offering me Full Time Job so I will join Co. A for same client Bank of Yamrica.
3. I am working for Co. B, where Ramro Vendor is Co.A and Prime Vendor is Accenture. Right now, Accenture is offering me Full Time Job so I will join Accenture for same client Bank of Yamrica.
4. I am working for Ramro Vendor Co. A and now being offered Full Time Job by Accenture and I am joining Accenture for the same client.

Malai bhanna aayena...but the question is..timi le dhoti ko company jasle timi lai aaile paycheck dii raa cha tyaslai chadera arko ramro vendor company ma jana laa ki sidhai client ma jana laa...based on their 'Non Compete' they can and I am saying from my observation that 'they can' file a lawsuit. Lawsuit file bhayo bhandai maa timi le harchau bhanne chaina..dhoti company lai arko lawsuit halera thik parna sakincha..tara there's a lot of hassle. I will write more wen I am sobber. Your take please.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article