Hey Sexi,

Turns out until yesterday, I believed women would show more compassion. Thank you for opening my eyes to the ugly truth.

If the police will keep shooting all suspects, then criminal lawyers will not get any clients. Then how do you expect them to pay-off the expensive law school student loans? And the for-profit prison systems and their vendors would also keep losing business if there would be no more convicts feeding the system. We will be missing all those B2B trickle-down effect the politicians seem to tout all the time.

I might be better off buying a gun myself and learn to shoot at legs and arms of would-be-criminals instead of calling the terminator-cops when I get into those situations myself.

I need the truth, not the facts (Go figure). And where are the video links?

Is this the video that shows the facts?

For the rest of the people who come up with reasonings that seem to fuel the downfall of Nepali community please read this snippet from my previous post:

Even if the police pussies have to shoot ( and can convince the public to believe it later) why don't they target the legs or non-vital body-parts? The point of using baton or fire-arm should be to disable the suspect and make an arrest and allow the rule of law to take its course. But it seems the final and the life-long lesson the police academies stresses to the recruits is to use the lowest common denominator at the slight hint of suspect-aggression no matter how unjustified, i.e., 

Last edited: 26-Nov-14 04:35 PM