I guess my point is it's entirely on one's perspective on whether to accept the God entity or not, and if accepted-how to define the said entity.
I agree my theory of the smallest particle being a God is flawed, but that was my point. Just like the biggest entity of all can be God-with some sound argument and a little flawed analysis (rejecting the notion of Universe having a start point)-so can the smallest entity can be argued to be a God. Didn't they teach us, we have God in us? Who makes us? God. The smallest particles are also within us and they make ourselves- so they must be God.

I am sure you'll agree that there is no one true doctrine or justification to the definition of religion and the notion of God. It depends upon once perspective and vantage. Likewise, it is wrong to force your belief onto others; not that I am saying you did it. I know you are merely expressing your realizations, I am sharing my opinion as well.