Posted by: republican October 2, 2004
bush or kerry?
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
My My, aren't you all great Monday quarterbacks with a pre-9/11 mentality. Facts: There's no proof that Bush lied about anything. Independent commissions (including both Reps and Dems) have investigated this and said that the CIA gave faulty intelligence to the administration, saying that WMDs in Iraq was a "slam dunk" case. That's why George Tenet has resigned, he took the fall for CIA's blunders. Every, and I say EVERY single person who received the intelligence came to the conclusion that Iraq did possess WMDs. Before the war, John Kerry himself appeared on TV and said that there was no doubt Saddam was a threat and had to go and that HE WOULD VOTE FOR THE WAR. And he did vote for the war. This president made a decision based on the same intelligence everyone else received and came to the same conclusion that everyone else did. It seems pretty ridiculous now that all these left-wing fanatics call him a liar. PROVE it first! If Bush is a liar, then every Democrat who voted for the war is also a liar. I'm not one of these right-wingers who think everything's swell in Iraq. I know its a mess out there. But I don't think Kerry can do any better than what Bush is doing right now. And I don't want Kerry to become President and provide a boost to all these left-wingers who think Saddam was an angel and he didn't deserve to have his ass kicked by the US. Jeezz, the way they talk about him, you'd think he was the Pope. By the way, France, Germany, Russia, etc. didn't go to war because they were benefiting from the UN Oil-for-Food program in Iraq. Its a big corruption scandal that's gonna come out soon (its being investigated at the UN). Hearing stuff like "France and Germany did the right thing" makes me laugh - as if they were guided by their morals! They were more concerned about their fat wallets.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article