Am I illogical to ask for Baidya's arrest?


A leader openly challenges the laws and rules of a country. The leader enjoys all the perk of the law and order of that country but doesn't want to uphold his end. He has taken full responsibility for the Nepal bandh and has threatened a grave outcome if the bandh is not followed. His cadres have burnt public vehicles and planted several explosive materials through-out the country. Why then can we not arrest the person who has openly claimed the responsibility for these actions? How is a person who plants a bomb for any other reason different to these political leaders who are doing pretty much the same?


Protests should be allowed, but if somebody uses violent means I am all for using every forcible way to suppress such action. Am I wrong on wanting this? Should we have some type of provision in the new constitution to condemn such protests?