I don't get it. So somebody posted a blog and I'm supposed to believe that ? Come on folks. Friends and relatives of this fella are going around the internet to defend him with anything they can. He might be a good person and his work praiseworthy, but I'm not going to believe that from a blog until there are plenty of evidences. Afterall, we are Nepali and anything can be faked and bought incuding resumes. Did he get to that job and get to travel all the way to the USA with his good work? I need more than friends and family coming up with proofs and blogs.

To defend him because he "tried" is yet another excuse that does not make sense. He "tried" is the cause of this uproar, which he should never had.

And he was representing disabled people, good work indeed. So the reason these days is that anybody who is NOT a diplomat, should be fine with no english skills. English is universal, is it too much to ask to know few sentences. Fine. Was he not aware that he is in the USA and someone might approach him speaking english? Is that a shocking revelation?

The reason the uproar on facebook is most people have the same views as us, majority rules. While some on fb have gone too far but I understand their reasoning. I am simply insisting he should have never spoken to the camera and he came off bit "lost" ( only using the word so that I don't offend his relatives and friends)

And I'm not going to apologize to anybody for expressing my opinions. I have nothing against this individual and I do not hate him, but he sure mentioned "Rice" and "Nepal" and made a joke out of it, esp on Fox news. What is wrong there to say, yes he did it. He will be better off in the future either not to speak at all, use an interpretor, or simply speak Nepali. Now, those are honest suggestions. Take it or leave it.