"Accomplished writers" of Sajha!!! What makes someone think that one is an accomplished writer whereas another is not? Are we going to look at the articles, books, published by a person beforing calling him/her accomplished writer? Or are we just going to trust our own judgement? What if I find a piece very interesting and amusing and others don't? Should I be wrong to call the author an accomplished writer? And San when you say, some good writing pieces disappear in oblivion, do you know why they have disappeared? Probably they are not good for the majority of people who visit this site. Think about it. For a piece to disappear there has to be a reason. And very soon, are we going to see a change in the web-site saying, ahhh intellegent, mature people don't visit this web-site, it is frequented by only immature thinkers? And then voila, we are going to see a members site.. And have you thought about changing the name of this site as well? "Sajha" sounds a bit contradicting when you start to filter out who posts what and where. Just my thoughts.