Posted by: freedom2012 April 30, 2013
Is Nepal better off as an indian territory?
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
lolz @ nalapani,

did i use sikkim as an economic trumpcard?. Of course Nepal is more beautiful without any doubt. I meant to use Sikkim to highlight the fact that they are not malnourished there, good law and order, did not see anyone defecate openly there. More to highlight that a state can fix itself.

Of course I love Nepal. Is it wrong to think of a better economic pathway for Nepal?. I am not anti-national my friend. I am pro human and i it is wrong that 90% Nepalese still suffer.

For a country with a mere 2-3 crore people, there is simply no excuse for this. The only reason why Nepal is like this is because we have failed as a country. What is use of being independent when all politicians head to Delhi?. Is Delhi in NEpal?. Honestly ask yourself, isnt Nepal one farce of a country?. Do you know the meaning of sovereignty?. Once you lose this, you lose independence.



Read Full Discussion Thread for this article