@ Rethink,

you never seem to get the point and you are misplacing the context. You have to use
critical thinking to debate. I cannot make head or tail out of your replies.

If you really have compromised on the visual verification system, then that is a step in the
right direction. Now you are free to search for the divine knowledge yourself.

@ Alternate,

All your pointers are basically the same, i have answered them before. Now, can you show me where
i said that only objective morality exists?. All the examples that i gave was about guided moral
values like not to kill, not to cheat, to be honest, not to lie, to be compassionate, to be
forgiving, to be egalitarian, etc. These are guided and purposeful process contrary to
evolution which is directionless, purposeless and unguided.

Now the examples you give are really minor ones like doing weed, smoking, eating beef/pork.
These are not objective universal moral values. Like you mentioned they are subjective. Religion
does not account for all forms of morality. But are not the above listed morals a fair amount
of accountability.

In contrast, Atheism provides no accountability for such objective moral values as listed
above. Therefore religion wins. Even 1% accountability is better than 0%.

I had be happy to discuss further about afterlife. Now let me start first by asking you what
is your definition for life?. Keep it short and sweet. No copy paste, no links.