@Alternate bro,

1) All i said was if religion were movies, christianity is hollywood. Now other movie industries have come up with some
   gem of movies too. I was speaking in context when i said that.

2) Argumentum ad populum is the logical fallacy involved. Even after i gave examples of logical fallacy, you want me to
   list the type of fallacy. Now that was so not smart of you.

3) Deists do not believe in miracles or mysteries of religion, i am open to them. In fact, i do believe in miracles.

4) As an Atheist, you have lost credibility because you are pitting one religion againsts the other. Whereas your main job
   is to use Atheism to prove your points. How does Atheism account for objective morality that which is good for the goose
   and also good for the gander?. Instead you only bring forward red herrings. Typical trademark Atheism.

5) To attribute life to unconsciousness would be to believe in a miracle even more greater than miracles of religion. My mind
   cannot comprehend such a miracle because it is unscientific. Something does not come from nothing. In Cause and Effect,
   a Cause is aptly satisfied when the Cause is conscious in origin. Who made the cake?. My mother. That's it, it is answered.
   There is no need to ask who made my mom as that is not the question. My mother is not eternal. But divine knowledge is
   eternal. That is the only way to stop infinite regress.

6) How does my being Theist, Agnostic, Deist, etc prove your stand on Atheism?. The definition for these beliefs are ever
   evolving. You can consider me a weak agnostic. Beliefs do overlap, it is unavoidable. But only Atheism stands apart in
   their absolute denial of existence of God but our beliefs never overlap into that. 

7) Using the cake analogy, it is possible to create something without being omnipresent/omniscient. So creation could
   happen at a higher level without being omniscient/omnipotent. 

8) You either indulge in red herring or ad hominem. You should focus more on your religion which is Atheism. You should debate
   from that perspective. Give a scientific rebuttal. You used Islam/Calvinism to prove your viewpoint about whose objective
   morality to follow. You forgot that those are religion, as an Atheist you should not use such examples. All religion
   preach good morality to a certain extent. I know playing devil's advocate is normal, but hignly hypocritical of Atheists
   to use religion to their favour at times.