Posted by: alternate February 1, 2013
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Freedom2012,
You resort to pseudo-spiritual abstract talks that are entirely self-serving and utterly misleading. The very first thing you say that we (the mankind, of course; and including you too) only know 4% of the Universe, which I believe you are talking about observable universe as it has been known the Universe to be infinite to us earthly beings . Your opinion (far from an assertion or any reasonable suggestion) tends to dismiss achievements of “Science” for its inability to explain unknowns- unknown or inexplicable at the time being. Yet your knowledge, whatever facts you know – that too not your innate acquisition -however much, is attributable to science. But your opinions – until you explain it or until it dawns onto me from unearthly power - I’ll keep on assuming comes from the fermentation of garbage that’s not even recyclable. I have a hypothesis that you only have 4% usable grey matters; rest of it filled with null particles, not only science but also the supernatural entity has any idea about, whatsoever.
Science doesn’t owe you anything, or anyone for that matter. Your belittling of Science, as a perceived nemesis just because it disproves myths (religious or not) and tries to explain phenomenon around, is a straw man fallacy. Your insecurity of Science, which is an inanimate object for an abstract straw man, is palpable in your accusation for its weakness – how “clueless” (borrowing your own word) can you be in asking an inanimate object to explain your faith (belief, or a dogma) and its implications. If you are resolute and firm about the dogma, which has been demonstrated to be immutable from your multiple posts, you don’t need to feel shaky about apostates that don’t share your belief (mind you, this is not fact – not even from any stretch known to rational human beings).
Your logical persuasion (or an attempt) to mystify “divine conscious” – maybe a sobriquet for religion, befuddles me. I don’t see a cogent argument, regardless of the topic itself. If you are trying to jabber religion by confusing lowly humans, you still didn’t succeed. Try harder.
You resort to pseudo-spiritual abstract talks that are entirely self-serving and utterly misleading. The very first thing you say that we (the mankind, of course; and including you too) only know 4% of the Universe, which I believe you are talking about observable universe as it has been known the Universe to be infinite to us earthly beings . Your opinion (far from an assertion or any reasonable suggestion) tends to dismiss achievements of “Science” for its inability to explain unknowns- unknown or inexplicable at the time being. Yet your knowledge, whatever facts you know – that too not your innate acquisition -however much, is attributable to science. But your opinions – until you explain it or until it dawns onto me from unearthly power - I’ll keep on assuming comes from the fermentation of garbage that’s not even recyclable. I have a hypothesis that you only have 4% usable grey matters; rest of it filled with null particles, not only science but also the supernatural entity has any idea about, whatsoever.
Science doesn’t owe you anything, or anyone for that matter. Your belittling of Science, as a perceived nemesis just because it disproves myths (religious or not) and tries to explain phenomenon around, is a straw man fallacy. Your insecurity of Science, which is an inanimate object for an abstract straw man, is palpable in your accusation for its weakness – how “clueless” (borrowing your own word) can you be in asking an inanimate object to explain your faith (belief, or a dogma) and its implications. If you are resolute and firm about the dogma, which has been demonstrated to be immutable from your multiple posts, you don’t need to feel shaky about apostates that don’t share your belief (mind you, this is not fact – not even from any stretch known to rational human beings).
Your logical persuasion (or an attempt) to mystify “divine conscious” – maybe a sobriquet for religion, befuddles me. I don’t see a cogent argument, regardless of the topic itself. If you are trying to jabber religion by confusing lowly humans, you still didn’t succeed. Try harder.