We only know 4% of the universe, the rest 96% is comprised of dark matter and dark energy. Scientists are clueless and  they cannot comprehend this 96%.
Scientists say "i dont know" all the time, so religion also should be given the freedom to say "i dont know" at times.
God is not a candy that i can take out from my pocket to show you.
If you take Cause and Effect, the only way an effect is satisfied thus preventing regress type questions is when the Cause is a conscious source.
Religion is an attempt to understand this divine conscious source. That is all that it is. By disproving religion, you do not disprove this source.
The proof is everywhere. What we know about Cause and Effect proves this source.
Using logic and knowledge that we get from life, there is simply no way, no evidence that something can come from nothing.
Otherwise we are left with ridiculous questions like "was there a time when there was no time?".
It is actually unscientific to say that there is no God because it is making assumptions about the unknow. That takes away the very purpose of being the unknown if you say that the unknown is also science.