Posted by: Khumbule December 19, 2012
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
When, I watched her story and read some of the reactions here, and made me drop a few words. I sensed a bit of fabricated story based on how she is speaking to the reporter. and do you notice how she is dressed up? on the interview? wow! By watching all this, I believe either she is an attention seeker or she is on some mess already and trying to cover it up before someting comes up in the light.
But don't get me wrong: she may be true. I am just pointing that not to make a quick judgment based on this one side of the story.
Ok, here is my take.
-- If her so-called husband (in her own words), was so abusive, why she did not report to the local authority in Nepal?
-- If her so-called husband and mother-in-laws are working for women rights, she does not mention what organization they represent to advocate such? and I wonder the reporter did not ask her that. (correct me If I am wrong or missed it).
-- She follows her so-called husband all the way to US and settles in some city/county NC, and still married to him (seems legally). In this case, why she did not report her case to the North Carolina Law Enforcement?
-- Why is she reporting her story of DV to Nepali media in first place while she is in North Carolina?
-- If husband is still abusive, she can report to local law enforcement office NC--(city)PD, and press charges or request for restraining order against him, over and over as long as she feels secure from him. While he is restrained, she can make him pay all hers and childrens, expenses by the court order. I do not hear any attempt she has mad so far.
-- and last if her husband is so bad, what is she waiting for? She can file for divorce. It is very easy for women who is the victim of domestic violence or battered to get divorce based on the fact, make husband pay all expenses for life long (depending on the case).
I do not see any of these happened into this women's life, so to me it seems she is covering up something or she is not telling the whole story. As I said, I do not make any sided judgement at this point.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Peace.
But don't get me wrong: she may be true. I am just pointing that not to make a quick judgment based on this one side of the story.
Ok, here is my take.
-- If her so-called husband (in her own words), was so abusive, why she did not report to the local authority in Nepal?
-- If her so-called husband and mother-in-laws are working for women rights, she does not mention what organization they represent to advocate such? and I wonder the reporter did not ask her that. (correct me If I am wrong or missed it).
-- She follows her so-called husband all the way to US and settles in some city/county NC, and still married to him (seems legally). In this case, why she did not report her case to the North Carolina Law Enforcement?
-- Why is she reporting her story of DV to Nepali media in first place while she is in North Carolina?
-- If husband is still abusive, she can report to local law enforcement office NC--(city)PD, and press charges or request for restraining order against him, over and over as long as she feels secure from him. While he is restrained, she can make him pay all hers and childrens, expenses by the court order. I do not hear any attempt she has mad so far.
-- and last if her husband is so bad, what is she waiting for? She can file for divorce. It is very easy for women who is the victim of domestic violence or battered to get divorce based on the fact, make husband pay all expenses for life long (depending on the case).
I do not see any of these happened into this women's life, so to me it seems she is covering up something or she is not telling the whole story. As I said, I do not make any sided judgement at this point.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Peace.
Last edited: 19-Dec-12 02:32 PM