हुन त यो किशोर जी ले खोल्नु भएको thread, उहाले एउटा बिशाये उठाउन भयो, तेही बिशयेमा बहस गर्नु राम्रो तर कहाँ बाट डाकु ले अर्को बिशयेमा बहस सुरु गरेर अझ तेस्माथी मलाई के हो आरोप लगाएर के भन्नु. हुन त डाकु हरु को काम नै तेस्तै होइन र अर्का को चोर्ने ? एकजना ले एउटा बिशयेमा बहस को लागि thread  खोलेको हुन्छ अरुले तेस्लाई चोरेर आफ्नो इक्च्या अनुसार को बहस गर्छन. अझ डाकु हरु त एस्तो मा एकदमै चलाख, अब नाम अनुसार को काम त गर्ने पर्यो 

Mr. Daaku,
“Dharke is propagandist “

lol. I do not support any cast any religion and "pahichhan" . I love to learn my lessons by studying others strength and mistakes they made. That’s easy way of learning things. To learn by owns mistakes first you need to make mistakes and some mistakes could cost you fortune. In my opinion that is the hard way of learning things. I learned from mistakes made by Europeans after the collapse of Roman Empire. My belief is also based on present need of the society and its flow., not influenced by cast,jaat and religion  
That does not mean I should ban any other belief so most of the time I repost thoughts of many beliefs. Society and human nature are  not like laws of physics they do not obey certain fixed rule. It is the continuous positive discussion that drives the society forward. So, by banning thoughts from some quarter of the society we may be delaying the progress. That is why I repost thoughts of different quarter of the society some of those thoughts you may have liked or it may have satisfied your ego some others may have fueled your ego. And, lately I may have reposted many thoughts which may have heightened your ego. But that is not my problem.

Someone somewhere asked a question "What is the sexiest part of your body"

Answer was "brain"
Because is the brain who first thinks about sex, asks glands to secret hormones then only our sex organs act.

Likewise, your entire claim about me seems like one of the side product of your ego, originated in your brain,  which most probably came from your incomplete study of history and society. I see you trying to debate about history with NALAPANI questioning about the version of the history he read. But what about the history you read? Don’t you feel necessary to question about the version of the History you read? That is why I said incomplete study of history. When you do not study (self study included) some subject thoroughly you will have more