It only shows someone's disconnected state of reality to compare artists such as picasso to the state of politics. Picasso can use his imagination and draw you sucking on your own organs and lot of creative things, but alas in politics you are limited to few main political parties. Even in a country like US, there are only two parties that have any major say and you have to choose contenders from either Democratic or Republican party.

Anyways, as they say, it's useless to argue with a fool because they will bring you down to their level so bathroomcoffee you are entitled to hold your own wishy washy wishful thinking ideals, which are unrelated to reality. You can freely throw in more of your out of touch with reality tantrums without any fear of repercussions.

Bitter truth I like your analysis. It is unfortunate that people are more concerned about what is written out there, or how things are supposed to be than trying to spend some time to understand that democracy is about choosing the lesser of the evil.

Democracy could have been good for Nepal if all things were as it's supposed to be. Politicians are supposed to work for the betterment of the country but that is far from the case. Consequently democracy is having a totally negative effect in Nepal. That coupled with lack of education and lack of opportunities, everthing is working it's case towards an inevitable never ending downward spiral, unless like I have advocated, a powerful entity takes everything under control and tries to steer us out of the inevitable doom.