Posted by: NALAPANI April 7, 2012
ऐतिहासिक पहिचानलाइ जातीयतासंग मुछ्नु दुर्भाग्यपूर्ण
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
 Kishore Limbuji, thanks for your reply. 

I want to be pretty concise here
 All the 22 states in bheri and karnali were of khasas. But not all 24 principalities in Gandak region beloned to magars. Just 12 of them belonged to magars (12 mangarat bhanne sunnu bhaekai hola, tara dheraima king chai thakuri nai hunthyo bhalai tyo magar bata elevate bhaeko thakuri nai kina nahos) rests belonged to thakuri/chhetris (nuwakot, gorkha etc). These 24 states also came to existence after the collapse of great khas empire. [I can provide you the names of 12 mangarats if you need]

2. I do not see your claim of only bahun and chhetri-thakuris to be in power valid. The truth is, before 2007 bahuns were in miserable conditions. Only raj purohit used to be powerful to some extent. Moreover, untill 1903 BS thakuris were the most powerful then came chhetris and magar and finally gurungs. Why not to write the truth. There were so many magar and gurung generals before Rana empire. In BS 1903 when Jung Bdr snatched all the political power he shunned all the elite thakuri, chhetri, magar and gurung out of power. When democracy dawned in 2007 then came the time of bahuns. How many PM can you see from chhetri community after 2007? Just 1 right? S B Thapa. Mr. Singh, Chand, and Deuba are from thakuri clans. So, chhetri harule sashan gare bhanuu teti upayukta nahola. Yes, we have huge representation in Nepal Army, I agree.


The thing that you said got on my nerve is "Bahun chhetri le nepal lai bharat ma bilaya garauchhan". What are your grounds for this allegation? Do you know kun chai jati ko nepal ko rastriyata bachai rakhna ma sabai bhanda badhi yogdan chha? 
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article