Posted by: jantare1 December 25, 2011
who iz Nas????
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
 felt like i should write, so here it is:

Nas was an interesting fellow on sajha. to be frank, i liked most of his posts. and that was mainly because, as others have pointed out, he seemed to be intelligent and knew answers to a lot of things. is he really that smart? or is it google speaking for him? he knows that. whatever it is, he seemed like an intelligent man with high abilities, at least mental. now, when it comes to his posts regarding women, he is nothing but a pathetic little pervert. anyone may refer to his posts to find that. he had no shame and no remorse. neither he had ability to accept the wrong he was doing (regarding the posts about women). he didn't want to lose and probably thought that there is no one smarter and popular than him. 

his supporters might argue that his intelligence is enough to keep his dark sides in the shade. but, if he was intelligent why did he act like a retard in the first place? and to those who claim that 99% of shajaites love him: if it were so, sajha would be almost empty by now. and those who say that people who don't like him do so just because of jealousy, you should know that there is nothing to be jealous about a pervert. well, i'm quite amused by his intelligence but i'm not jealous of him in any way. some of nas's followers are saying that he can use his incredible mind in better things. well, he is isn't he? in his own site, right? he's created a common whorehouse (no offense to any females, just implying the filth) for all of you to freely express your profanity which you call intelligence and maybe coolness too. well, i guess there can't be any better way to use his intellect that by doing that, right fellas?

i personally consider him an arrogant because he was smart enough to post interesting comments but not just that smart; if he were really a smart guy, he wouldn't do such things to get his own a$$ smacked. 
Last edited: 25-Dec-11 11:32 PM
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article