No, it was not a bad "analogy" at all. let me explain: if Alice had a dream about being in wonderland and Dorothy had a dream about being in the land of Oz and both did not have any proof, then according to Homey ji it still is real and that they don't need to prove shit about being in those places, their experiences (dreams) should be  enough proof to make everyone else believe in what they think is real, in this case Wonderland and Oz.
Homey ji had a similar experience as Alice and Dorothy and he does not have any proof, he thinks it's godly and strongly believes it is related to god.
Get my point?