Posted by: grgDai November 16, 2011
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Eastsidaz I have been reading some of your posting and you have repeated your question multiple times so I wanted to respond.
Noone's arguing or questioning the legality of the move here!
You have not understood the greivances against BRB.
What people are dissatisfied about is how BRB who claimed to fight for justice for the masses is being a hypocrite when he wants to pardon his comrades for murder and make convicted murderer a minister.
That's all.
You've brought up the point about phone calls and those things are fine and good if they are able to advantageous to the public. However it is yet to be seen.
What has been clearly seen is that BRB who demanded justice for common peasants and who seemingly fought to bring down a feudal system is now openly denying justice for a commoner which the Nepali court had granted. He is seemingly bringing back his own feudal system by pardoning his own fellows at the cost of justice and what he had supposedly fought against.
Noone's arguing or questioning the legality of the move here!
You have not understood the greivances against BRB.
What people are dissatisfied about is how BRB who claimed to fight for justice for the masses is being a hypocrite when he wants to pardon his comrades for murder and make convicted murderer a minister.
That's all.
You've brought up the point about phone calls and those things are fine and good if they are able to advantageous to the public. However it is yet to be seen.
What has been clearly seen is that BRB who demanded justice for common peasants and who seemingly fought to bring down a feudal system is now openly denying justice for a commoner which the Nepali court had granted. He is seemingly bringing back his own feudal system by pardoning his own fellows at the cost of justice and what he had supposedly fought against.