Ojaswi, it should have been Bal Krishna Dhungel and you said Shrestha.  Now again, your alternative for BRB is to condemn the murder, accept it as a mistake and respect supreme courts decision. Seriously, how likely do you think it is? In my opinion, BRB would rather resign from the premiership( I am not sure if that is what you want) than recant his position. Don't you think he was under pressure from his cohorts to sign this amnesty.
    Well, Supreme court decision should be upheld but it is not unconstitutional to ask amnesty for a person found guilty by the Supreme court. Nepal has legislative branch, administrative and executive branch and each has been given appropriate power and directives on how one should address the other. I just found out that Ujjan was an Oda Adekhsya candidate for Nepali Congress, so political motive can't be completely ignored. Since this case is gathering so much heat, I think that it is not just pursued by the victim's family but by the opposition force as a ploy to derail the government. By this, I am not justifying Dhungel's amnesty but my point is if it is going in a procedural way then let it be. Someone was quoting these murders were to be pardoned as by the signed treaty. Well I am not sure about the treaty but my shoutout is that if there is a way to prevent another Nepal Bandh, let's go that way. If there is a way to prevent another civil war, let's go that way. Do you really want these Maobadis to go back to jungle and wage another war? Can you tell me how many lives will it cost? if there is a next war, I think the total casualty will be ten times that 15000. Do you really wanna take that path?
   I can't understand why we Nepalese are so regressive. We are in the verge of radical change and still we can't abandon our old ways. It's about time we put our nation in front of our emotions. If we get roiled in these kind of events, we will never see a bright future. And guess who will be benefitting from it. The neighbors. Not us.