What I don't understand is every single Maoist leader are saying that in the post-war era it is not a good practice to reinstigate what had happened earlier. They (including the CA member Devi Khadka and BRB) claim that if we start asking for eye for an eye then we will all be blind. They say if we want to move ahead then we shouldn't scratch the old wounds.
If this is their justification for asking for pardon of Mr. Dhungel then they are contradicting the very justification they are going along with. Shouldn't they have accepted the Supreme court's ruling and moved ahead? They are the ones who scratched the old wound by reviving the case.

Am I confused or are they just trying to confuse us?