Posted by: BABAL Khate November 9, 2011
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
It's obvious that Homeyji was simply using the Prithvi Narayan Shah analogy to illustrate a greater point.
Homeyji, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the greater point you were making is that discovering God is not cheap. Am I wrong? That is what I took away from the conversation.
But I have my own point:
How can Chaurey or anyone else here demand for proof for God and just expect to receive this "proof"? What form of proof would be adequate for you? What kind of data would satisfy you?
When I read the history of Newton or Einstein, I don't remember them just showing up on forums like sajha and yelling and screaming and demanding proof of gravity or the laws of physics. I don't remember them simply demanding that the principles of Relativity reveal itself to whoever demanded it?
That is not how these great scientists discovered the laws of nature.
Homeyji, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the greater point you were making is that discovering God is not cheap. Am I wrong? That is what I took away from the conversation.
But I have my own point:
How can Chaurey or anyone else here demand for proof for God and just expect to receive this "proof"? What form of proof would be adequate for you? What kind of data would satisfy you?
When I read the history of Newton or Einstein, I don't remember them just showing up on forums like sajha and yelling and screaming and demanding proof of gravity or the laws of physics. I don't remember them simply demanding that the principles of Relativity reveal itself to whoever demanded it?
That is not how these great scientists discovered the laws of nature.