Posted by: nepalilaure September 27, 2011
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Nalapani,
I dont think the govt of baburam is formed for the sikkimization of Nepal. It could be a conspiracy theory though.
If, for a moment , we assume that baburam govt is a part of RAW's vested interest, I think we need to go a few years back. If India is/was planning to annex Nepal slowly, then a major step was taken with the help of 'Durbar Massacre'.
No one can believe that a person can kill his mother and father just because he was not allowed to marry a girl of his choice OR due to a greed of few crore rupees commission for the purchase of arms and ammunitions for the then 'Royal' Nepal Army. Anyone can say that there was a bigger interest. If I have to list the involved parties, I can make a three level of involvement.
a) A foreign power ( possibly india, which many people suspect): Until the time of former King Birendra , monarchy was a number one champion of nationalist cause in Nepal. This is agreed by almost all the political forces in Nepal. So, Birendra was killed as it would be easier for that foreign power to operate in Nepal.
b) a secondary force which was convinced by the above mentioned foreign power that he will get a full support if mission accomplished. So, this secondary force did everything to make the incident happen.
c) plan executioner: some people say it is Dipendra, some say there was somebody else. Whoever he is, he did everything according to the direction of the secondary force mentioned above. I hope no one agrees that there was a 'swachalit hatiyar' which went on 'bhata ...ta.. ta..' by itself.
So, If there is any indian grand design to annex Nepal, there has to be a thorough investigation of Durbar Massacre, which i cant see happenning anytime soon.
About the Maoist attrocities during so called 'people's war', I dont think there is anyone who supoorts their killing of innnocent and unharmed people like 'teacher-Mukti Nath Adhikari'. There are many other cases and I strongly believe that those involved should be tried in a court of law. There is no reason in giving them a general amnesty.
I have also seen, three people of the same family killed by the Nepal Army. First one was said to be killed while he was completely unarmed. Security forces killed him after they took him for an 'interrogation'. After the first member was killed, rest of the two young adult joined the maoist militia and were killed during armed attacks. I dont have anything about those later two, because they were armed and they were the ones who went to attack security post. But, the first one lost his life for nothing, just being a maoist supoorter (?). I guess it was obvious on the part of second and third person to join maoist army after thier brother was killed without any apparent reason. 'ragat ko badala ragat bhanchan ni'. Theoretically, i strongly believe that we should not go for 'ragat to badala ragat' but, I am not sure what would I do if that occurs to my family.
I support the people who believe that 'only the victim can forgive', that is the close relatives of people who were killed. If the victim do not forgive, they should be tried in a court. Whenever there is a case killing an unarmed person, that should not be left unanswered in the name of political consensus and peace.
Lastly, the bigger question of making prachanda and baburam responsible for the killing of 13000 and trying them in international criminal court: i dont think that will solve the problem, if they are tried, the government leadership that was in place during that time will also be dragged into because there are many cases caused by security forces that can not fall under the domain of international human right practices. So, the only solution could be a strong National reconcillian and truth commission, though it will take tens of years to fully get ride of traces of conflict and pain.
I dont think the govt of baburam is formed for the sikkimization of Nepal. It could be a conspiracy theory though.
If, for a moment , we assume that baburam govt is a part of RAW's vested interest, I think we need to go a few years back. If India is/was planning to annex Nepal slowly, then a major step was taken with the help of 'Durbar Massacre'.
No one can believe that a person can kill his mother and father just because he was not allowed to marry a girl of his choice OR due to a greed of few crore rupees commission for the purchase of arms and ammunitions for the then 'Royal' Nepal Army. Anyone can say that there was a bigger interest. If I have to list the involved parties, I can make a three level of involvement.
a) A foreign power ( possibly india, which many people suspect): Until the time of former King Birendra , monarchy was a number one champion of nationalist cause in Nepal. This is agreed by almost all the political forces in Nepal. So, Birendra was killed as it would be easier for that foreign power to operate in Nepal.
b) a secondary force which was convinced by the above mentioned foreign power that he will get a full support if mission accomplished. So, this secondary force did everything to make the incident happen.
c) plan executioner: some people say it is Dipendra, some say there was somebody else. Whoever he is, he did everything according to the direction of the secondary force mentioned above. I hope no one agrees that there was a 'swachalit hatiyar' which went on 'bhata ...ta.. ta..' by itself.
So, If there is any indian grand design to annex Nepal, there has to be a thorough investigation of Durbar Massacre, which i cant see happenning anytime soon.
About the Maoist attrocities during so called 'people's war', I dont think there is anyone who supoorts their killing of innnocent and unharmed people like 'teacher-Mukti Nath Adhikari'. There are many other cases and I strongly believe that those involved should be tried in a court of law. There is no reason in giving them a general amnesty.
I have also seen, three people of the same family killed by the Nepal Army. First one was said to be killed while he was completely unarmed. Security forces killed him after they took him for an 'interrogation'. After the first member was killed, rest of the two young adult joined the maoist militia and were killed during armed attacks. I dont have anything about those later two, because they were armed and they were the ones who went to attack security post. But, the first one lost his life for nothing, just being a maoist supoorter (?). I guess it was obvious on the part of second and third person to join maoist army after thier brother was killed without any apparent reason. 'ragat ko badala ragat bhanchan ni'. Theoretically, i strongly believe that we should not go for 'ragat to badala ragat' but, I am not sure what would I do if that occurs to my family.
I support the people who believe that 'only the victim can forgive', that is the close relatives of people who were killed. If the victim do not forgive, they should be tried in a court. Whenever there is a case killing an unarmed person, that should not be left unanswered in the name of political consensus and peace.
Lastly, the bigger question of making prachanda and baburam responsible for the killing of 13000 and trying them in international criminal court: i dont think that will solve the problem, if they are tried, the government leadership that was in place during that time will also be dragged into because there are many cases caused by security forces that can not fall under the domain of international human right practices. So, the only solution could be a strong National reconcillian and truth commission, though it will take tens of years to fully get ride of traces of conflict and pain.