Mr. Shiva, 1. After reading three of you inputs it seems to me that you are emotionally attached to the parties. When someone is emotionally attached to something she/he is biased and incapable of independent thinking. 2. You label Nepalese as subjects (twice) that directly means either you are blaming or you are complaining about Nepalese. And, if you are using that word just to provoke then you are underestimating ppls power. 3. On one hand you say ýwhy blame parties" on the other hand yourself blame Nepali ppl. This proves my first point. And, also your attitude "I know everything about everythingý and others donýt know "anything about anything". In former Soviet Union for 70 yrs they never blamed party but blamed ppl and what was the result you know. 4. By logically putting parties above the ppl you directly or indirectly indicated that you still dont know what is politics. In old days ppl used to say ýKing is above the Sambidhan" and now you are saying "parties are above pplý, May be you are "New Avatar of King". Very striking similarities ha? 5. It seems to me, you are 100% right in your fourth point, by saying that you gave me the impression as you were saying ýIs indulging in Locknow Loot inalienable right of Shahas, Ranas, and Gurujyus and Wagles only? Let poor Maoist have a go at it. They will destroy themselves in the process. And, I thank you for this, for giving indirect hint about your intention. 6. Panchyat system treated ppl as subject and try to educate them for more than 40 yrs and you know what happened. 7. Multiparty leaders treated ppl as source of power for more than 50 yrs. They remained in the heart of ppl, survived all the odds and finally came to power. Once in power they started to treat ppl as subject and you know what happened in 12 yrs. 8. From the beginning you are labeling ppl as subjects, you should know your destination. Enjoy the life