Mr. Rauniyar ji, Allow me to add my experience in this field. (please keep in mind that I am neither a politician nor I supported anyone). 1. It is not the party we should choose, the smart person should win the election (its not happening in Nepal). 2. Very few smart ppl have chosen their carrier as politician. Most of the politician in Nepal are a) corrupt b) with low IQ c) emotional d) lost, they really dont know what to do. 3) Talk of the parties and so called netas are like "prastabana of Panchyati Sambhidhan" that read "Shosan Rahit Samaj ko Nirman Garne" like a satire 4) Useless "karmachari tantra" . After "BA" (say arround 20 yrs) if you work hard you can become "Sakha Adhikrit". The famous "Sakha Adhikrit" enters into the "system" and start to learn " How to be corrupt in 100 days". After 3-4 yrs in service he is expert in making politician and ppl fool. I believe Panchyati system institutionalizeed this type of stupid working system 5) Lack of creativity at higher level. If we go to tax office to pay tax its always a big "jhanjat" to pay the tax (what a paradox). 6) System of "tippini" in Prasasan. If a TU Teacher has to go abroad for a one month of training he will be selected in TU first then the "file" goes to "mantralaya" and "sakha adhikrit" start "tippini" it goes to "mantri" back to "sakha adhikrit" and finally to TU. If the teacher is from "Jilla" campus the file first goest to TU central office and then to Jilla campus. What a lengthy stupid process why cant the VC of TU canýt make final decision? This is just one example how HMG works. 7. Now letýs go to Local bodies. If we go nagar palika for "Naxa Pass". Its like one has to go through "Chakrabhiew". There is no one window shopping for ordinary ppl. HMG do not have any system. Those so called system what they say they have is nothing but chaos because they can not deliver routine output for routine work. Regarding the development of the country. Let me start from 1960s because they say the real developmental work started from there. If I look other countries from 1960 onwards, I usually ask question to myself a) how many countries developed into so called "first world" after 1960 and what was their political system? b) How many countries developed into so called ýsecond world" and what was their political system c) how many countries remained third world and what were their political system? let me answer question a) After 1960 only South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan (questionable) became first world (where total output is surplus) and all of them had one man show (Military dictatorship in S. Korea), Li Quan Wu in Singapore, British non elected system in Hongkong and one man show (Chiang Kai Sek and his family) in Taiwan, answer to question b) lots of countries developed into so called "second world" (where total out put meets the demand) examples are Malaysia, China, some previous communist countries, some middle eastern countries, and what about their political system all one man show (non election, except in Malaysia where also there was one man show of Dr. Mahathir Mohammad). for question c) majority of countries remained so called "third world" (where total output does not meet the demand) and their political system. Mixed, so called democracy and dictatorship or Monachism. So, what we need and what will work for us ? Its getting too long allowme to stop here for the time being Contdýýý..