Posted by: busenitz August 31, 2011
Does the US consider Nepal's prime minister a global terrorist?
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
 There might not be any relevance with the thread but I was just jotting some stuffs which had been on my mind. Let me repeat again, I am not a maoist my self but I dont understand why US is still tagging them as a terrorist after Maoist emerged as a biggest political force in our nation. US could have said they wouldn't accept the result of the election but they said they will respect the people mandate and they tag the party with the biggest mandate as a terrorist. It just doesnot make sense to me at all. If they were gonna consider maoist as a terrorist, US should have just said we wont accpet what people decide. Same thing with NC and UML. They keep saying Maoist need to leave their arms and be a peaceful party. Why the heck did you let a party with arms to compete in the election and spent another five years whining and fussing? I may not have understood the politics properly or I might have been confused or these parties along with US are stupid. 
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article