Posted by: pire June 20, 2011
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Guys, don't get me wrong. I don't condone extra-marrital affairs. But legally, the wife deserves half of what they jointly earned during their married life. Plus, she seemed to have run her own business too.
We are not some medieval era. We don't have to burn the wife, just because she likes someone else. She might have got bored with the businessman husband, who probably talked about only vehicle all his life. She might wanted some excitement in her life, and Bhuvan KC is quite a catch for excitement seeking woman, don't you think?
How many of us are willing to condemn a husband who brought second wife in her 40s? Are you willing to provide legal protection to the first wife guaranteeing her all his property? Let's work on that if we really feel so strongly.
Dangol trusted his first wife and put all his property in her name. They do this quite frequently these days, because it costs less in registration if you put property in your wife's name. In our household, women own most of the properties.So, it is a trend that is supposed to empower women. It has its own consequences too.
Since we don't know her side of story-- I just said what I thought her legal rights could be. Morally, I don't support her actions, but legally, if she really wants to leave her husband, I think it is her right. In that case, she should get what her rightful property is.
We are not some medieval era. We don't have to burn the wife, just because she likes someone else. She might have got bored with the businessman husband, who probably talked about only vehicle all his life. She might wanted some excitement in her life, and Bhuvan KC is quite a catch for excitement seeking woman, don't you think?
How many of us are willing to condemn a husband who brought second wife in her 40s? Are you willing to provide legal protection to the first wife guaranteeing her all his property? Let's work on that if we really feel so strongly.
Dangol trusted his first wife and put all his property in her name. They do this quite frequently these days, because it costs less in registration if you put property in your wife's name. In our household, women own most of the properties.So, it is a trend that is supposed to empower women. It has its own consequences too.
Since we don't know her side of story-- I just said what I thought her legal rights could be. Morally, I don't support her actions, but legally, if she really wants to leave her husband, I think it is her right. In that case, she should get what her rightful property is.