Posted by: Riten March 22, 2011
Law of Karma Explained in Simple Science
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
 While the initial premise that "everything is energy" sounds valid, the rest is mere new age pseudo-science.  I would like to think the rest of the arguments are true, but there is no scientific basis for it.

And I hate the justifications such as that made in second sentence preposterous.  Apparently Einstein's theories were already known and proven in Vedas.  Yeah... rrright!!  Apparently we already had aircrafts thousands of years ago.  Don't believe me?  How do you account for Ravan's pushpak bimaan?  C'mon.  

Spirituality has its place.  But one cannot give it gravitas by claiming scientific basis when there is none, at least not "scientifically" proven as yet.
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article