Posted by: sidster March 13, 2011
Login in to Rate this Post:
0 
? 
?
Terobaje,
I think that Gyanendra would have survived if he was not Known as Paras's father. I am not against Monarchy. If Birendra, dipendra, Nirajan was around if would have probably voiced for Monarchy, even Shruti as a queen. You do not hide the facts away just because You love someone.
Again you will probably call me a commie for saying this fact but look...Nepal was compared to Singapore some 60 years ago...when Mahedra was around....We Fell behind Singaore during Mahendra and Birendra time...when multi party system came over singapore had already left us far far behind. Do some research before what the Paras gang feeds you. I would still pick mahendra and Birendra over these politicians even though they were not able to keep us up with the Sigaporeans.
Do not compare the Silence that came with the fear of dictatorship wiht Peace. In addition, the world is much less safer with or without multi party system...In India, US, China, Europe...you name it...the world was much safer everywhere back then.
Since the Monarchs are gone...lot more People are able have acccess to electricity, education and Drinking water number wise. Nepal is just not KTM valley. 20 years ago there were 2 Lakhs people in the valley...now there are almost 30 Lakhs, we share the same amout of water and electricity between 30 Lakhs now. Now do not try to put words in my mouth by posting Kings would have increased the supplies for todays need. I am not trying to prove it to you that Monarchs are equally as bad as the politicians but just giving you some facts. So after democracy indeed more people have access to Drinking water and Electricity.
Again coming back to your Paras comment...I would not vote for you to be prince for your past for what you said you did and i would not vote for paras to be a prince for what he has involved with. You forgive your friend for being a Sober, you forgive your relative for changing from his past but you do not want a thug to lead your nation.
I think that Gyanendra would have survived if he was not Known as Paras's father. I am not against Monarchy. If Birendra, dipendra, Nirajan was around if would have probably voiced for Monarchy, even Shruti as a queen. You do not hide the facts away just because You love someone.
Again you will probably call me a commie for saying this fact but look...Nepal was compared to Singapore some 60 years ago...when Mahedra was around....We Fell behind Singaore during Mahendra and Birendra time...when multi party system came over singapore had already left us far far behind. Do some research before what the Paras gang feeds you. I would still pick mahendra and Birendra over these politicians even though they were not able to keep us up with the Sigaporeans.
Do not compare the Silence that came with the fear of dictatorship wiht Peace. In addition, the world is much less safer with or without multi party system...In India, US, China, Europe...you name it...the world was much safer everywhere back then.
Since the Monarchs are gone...lot more People are able have acccess to electricity, education and Drinking water number wise. Nepal is just not KTM valley. 20 years ago there were 2 Lakhs people in the valley...now there are almost 30 Lakhs, we share the same amout of water and electricity between 30 Lakhs now. Now do not try to put words in my mouth by posting Kings would have increased the supplies for todays need. I am not trying to prove it to you that Monarchs are equally as bad as the politicians but just giving you some facts. So after democracy indeed more people have access to Drinking water and Electricity.
Again coming back to your Paras comment...I would not vote for you to be prince for your past for what you said you did and i would not vote for paras to be a prince for what he has involved with. You forgive your friend for being a Sober, you forgive your relative for changing from his past but you do not want a thug to lead your nation.