Raju,

The analysis I performed was unbiased. I equally resent Sujata and all the leaders of our country as much as I resent Paras. But during an argument, Paras used a firearm when he could have used his fists. And considering his turbulent past, it leads not only me, but every person to believe that he must have done something he usually did in his past life? What is wrong with an analysis. I never mentioned I supported Sujata or any of her evil-doings. I am strictly speaking of case at hand and what could have happened. Is it a crime to pitch in your thoughts in sajha without calling names?